Reading time : 1 minutes
In the high-stakes world of international diplomacy, U.S. President Donald Trump has positioned himself boldly in the spotlight not merely as a negotiator of peace, but as a potential epicentre of global peacemaking. He asserts he has helped end or mediate seven wars and oversaw a landmark 20-point peace plan in Gaza, and now asks: Could those accomplishments earn him the Nobel Peace Prize?
Trump has frequently claimed credit for ushering in ceasefires and peace accords across continents. Having returned to the White House with a renewed focus on diplomacy, he has publicly linked his peace initiatives to his eligibility for the prize. Critics say the timing and self-promotion suggest an ambition toward the prize rather than an unvarnished quest for peace.
Among the claims:
- His administration brokered the original Arab-Israeli “Abraham Accords” during his first term.
- After his return, Trump fast-tracked a 20-point peace plan for Gaza and hosted Israeli and Arab leaders at the White House.
- He also opened talks with Russia via Vladimir Putin, aiming at peace in Ukraine—though that effort foundered.
- Diplomats suggest the deadline for Iran-Israel and Gaza hostages, and the prize announcement date, influenced the deal timetable.
Though some of the deals still face deep obstacles, these actions underpin his claim of peacemaking.
The Prize Criteria and the Question of Timing
The Nobel Peace Prize, awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, follows Alfred Nobel’s original mandate to reward “fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Often the prize recognises long-term, deeply grounded work. Trump’s backers say his recent high-visibility deals meet the spirit of the rule; skeptics argue they may be too fresh, too politically charged, and that pledges to build peace are not the same as durable peace.
There are significant objections:
- Some analysts say Trump’s peace deals remain fragile; the true test will be sustained peace, not signed statements.
- His insistence on the prize and publicising his claims has startled longtime peacemakers.
- The mere expectation of reward has prompted questions about motive: is the prize the driver or a by-product of peace work?
In short: many wonder whether the ambition for the prize should sit so visibly beside the ambition for peace.
The Verdict: Not a Sure Bet
While Trump may indeed have achieved meaningful diplomacy, the odds of the prize are far from certain. Winning would depend on whether the Committee views the results as genuine, lasting advances in peace — not just headline-grabbing accords.
With the announcement date looming, one question remains: Has President Trump done enough — in result and in sincerity — to satisfy a prize that rewards peace, not publicity?
Donald Trump has elevated his peacemaking credentials and is very publicly campaigning his case. But the Nobel Peace Prize doesn’t reward ambition alone — it honours peace made real. Whether this moment crosses that threshold is unclear. The global community will be watching whether his deals translate into durable change — and whether the Nobel Committee is prepared to reward them.
(This article is based on the opinion piece “From Ceasefires to Accords: Can US President Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize?” published by WION News.)